
Please welcome Bay 13’s newest contributor, Nick.
Two things you need to know about him.
One, he loves cricket stats.
Two, he is only 13 years old.
Dennis
———————-
What comes to mind when I say “number 11 batsman?”
For most of you, it’s someone who is wracked with nerves before the start of their innings, panics at the sight of fast bowlers, is completely bamboozled by ordinary spinners, and generally spends longer walking to the crease than staying there.
I’m that sort of player.
I think of Ashton Agar’s 98 innings and 163 partnership with the legendary Phil Hughes at Trent Bridge in 2013.
Who, however, is the greatest #11 batsman of all time?
To work this out, I’m setting a benchmark of 30 Test innings batted.
Batting averages of all #11s to have batted at least 30 innings
Far and away, Nathan Lyon leads this. Trent Boult is the only one who even comes close. As such, the result will be restricted to only those with an average of 10 or more.
This leaves:
- Lyon
- Boult
- WA Johnston
- JB Statham
- AA Donald
- RGD Willis
- I Sharma
- M Muralitharan
- AN Connolly
- JM Anderson
Another thing of importance for a number 11 is to be able to stay at the crease for a long time.
We worked out the average number of balls faced (a stat that, sadly, Cricinfo doesn’t keep for us). This did, however, lead to us having to disqualify Connolly, Statham, and Johnston, as their stats aren’t wholly complete.
So, the results for this:
- Willis: 18.35
- Anderson: 13.06
- Muralitharan: 8.16
- Lyon: 18.81
- Donald: 17.72
- Boult: 15.97
- Sharma: 12.97
We’re eliminating everyone below 15 for this, leaving us with Willis, Lyon, Donald, and Boult.
Next to consider is the tenth-wicket partnership.
A number 11 is very good if they can enable their partner some precious time at the crease.
So, the number of 50-run tenth wicket partnerships:
- Lyon: 3
- Willis: 4
- Donald: 4
- Boult: 5
Alas, our Aussie boy Nathan Lyon is eliminated. Now would be a good time to recap. Earning three points for being the best out of our final three, two points for second, and one for third, we get:
- TA Boult: 7
- RGD Willis: 6
- AA Donald: 6
We do, however, now need to come up with a final, decisive analysis. We will consider their performance compared to their fellow number 11’s and teammates in their careers.
We will work out the difference between (Note: 10 innings required for both categories):
- Them and the highest averaging #11 during their career.
- Them and the lowest averaging teammate during their career.
This leads to…
- Boult: -12.36 to other #11s, +13.61 to other New Zealanders, +1.25
- Willis: -18.09 to other #11s, +0.66 to other Englishmen, -17.43
- Donald: -3.73 to other #11s, +4.12 to other South Africans, +0.39
All hail Trent Boult, the greatest #11 of all time…
For now.
Boult’s career is far from finished, and that might lead to his stats slipping below Donald’s. And, if Nathan Lyon is involved in a 50 partnership with Josh Hazlewood, I’d have to include him in the analysis.
Be warned, Boult. There’s no safety at the top.
- Don’t Burst the BBL Bubble - December 23, 2016
- Ode to a Cricket Bat - November 11, 2016
- The Day Bradman Reversed The Batting Order - September 1, 2016
- Dot. Dot. Dot. Dot. Dot. Dot - July 30, 2016
- Mankad - February 4, 2016
DennisCricket_ Bruce Doull?:
DennisCricket_ NickTheStatsGuy Ryan Giggs ?
Love it! Nice work Nick!!
DennisCricket_ NickTheStatsGuy wow, what a genius! Are you sure he’s 13 and not just a wise old hobbit trying to pass for a 13 year old?
jjkvw I assure you, I am just 13. Wise beyond my years.
Cracking job Nick! Still can’t believe you’re only 13.
Just with the analysis, is it worth looking into scorebands of times +/- 20 runs as, in my opinion, there is a higher likelihood that the more time a “bunny” bats the more likely they’ll make a low score? This then provides a potential greater average score for batsman who gave has less innings. I’m not a world class stats guru like Dan Liebke, so I may be on the wrong track.. Love the article though. Keep up the excellent work and don’t stop loving cricket!! 🙂
NickTheStatsGuy hats off to you good sir! Keep up the amazing work U0001f44d
Impressive stuff. Hope you put as much effort in to your school work which is also important. You’ll be on Channel 9 in no time!
Nick,
Boult also was part of a century partnership (as did WIllis, although Boult’s was bigger), whereas Donald and Lyon did not. Boult contributed 52* of a 127-run stand against Bangladesh. So chalk up another point to Boult there.
I guess you could do a post for worst #11 ever, but it wouldn’t be terribly edifying: just post a picture of Chris “Phantom” Martin!
Raff
Brilliant Nick! Ty and all the best!
Good article! I would like to know if there has ever been a better #9 batsman than Paul Reiffel. I can’t ever remember one who had a better forward defence than Pistol.
@Raff Tufnell
Hi Nick,
Nice work mate! I am just wondering about your analysis for balls faced – is that balls faced per innings, or balls faced per completed innings (that is, taking not outs into account)?
I hope Nathan Lyon isn’t being penalised here because of his batting partners being dismissed!
scrim It’s based on balls per innings. I probably should base it on balls per completed innings.